In-depth Compare of Major Domestic and International Low-Code Platforms for Local Deployment, including throughMendix, OutSystems, light cavalry, going as fast as possible, Kingdee, NetEaseCodeWave, movable typeface,MiCount Cloud, MingDaoYun, Partner Cloud, etc., for enterpriseITselection, Channelizer Programming, Professional reference for project delivery assessment.
Modeling through visualization+Few code extensions, Enabling rapid development of business systems, Development platform that supports complex logic and multi-system integration.
Fully drag-and-drop operation, Prefabricated formwork erection business applications, No need to write code, Focus on lightweight scenarios for quick landing.
From Architecture Support, Deployment complexity, Data localization retention, Four dimensions of deployment scalability are compared
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture Support | ★★★★★ Mendix/OutSystemsbe in favor ofx86/ARMdual architecture, K8scontainerization; PowerAppsadapterAzureLocal Kit | ★★★★☆ light cavalry/Taffan support.x86/ARMdual architecture, Kingdee/NetEase adapts local nodes of domestic cloud vendors, all supportK8s | ★★★★☆☆ MiCount Cloud/MingDaoYun/Partner Cloud Supportx86build, single node/Simple Cluster Deployment, Partial support for lightweight Containerization, no ARM adapter. | Low-code architecture for greater compatibility, 0Code Focused Lightweight Deployment |
| Deployment complexity | ★★★★☆☆ Requires professional operation and maintenance, English brochure, First deployment7-10 days, Dependence on overseas components | ★★★★★ Chinese Toolkit, light cavalry/Kingdee One Click Deployment, 3-5lit. the sky falls on the ground, Localized Remote Assistance | ★★★★★ MiCount Cloud/Minto Cloud offers foolproof deployment tools, 1-2DAYS COMPLETED, No need for professional operation and maintenance | 0Lowest threshold for code deployment, Domestic low code is better than foreign |
| Data localization retention | ★★★★☆ Full data local storage, Mendix/OutSystemsSome logs need to be synchronized overseas(closeable) | ★★★★★ Full-link local retention, Light Cavalry supports desensitized backups, Adaptation to domestic data security laws | ★★★★☆ Full local storage, MiCount Cloud/Partner Cloud supports linkage with domestic backup software, No off-site disaster recovery | Domestic brands are more in line with local data retention requirements |
| Deployment scalability | ★★★★★ OutSystemsSupports millions of concurrency, Seamless multi-geographic node linkage | ★★★★☆ light cavalry/Devon supports cluster expansion, NetEase can carry5010,000 level concurrency | ★★★☆☆ adapter10Concurrency within 10,000, MiCount Cloud/Mindray Cloud supports horizontal scaling, Limited scalability | Low-code adaptation for large-scale scenarios, 0Code to meet lightweight requirements |
From Security Certification, access control, Three dimensions of data security protection for Compare
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| safety certification | ★★★★☆ PowerAppsDiploma of Equal Protection III, Mendix has ISO27001, adaptation without state secrets | ★★★★★ The Light Cavalry is insured by the Military Industrialization Division./State secret certification, going as fast as possible/NetEase supports the state secret algorithm | ★★★☆☆ MiCount Cloud/Minto Cloud over Equalization Level 2, Partner Cloud supports basic data encryption, No State secret certification | Better low-code security compliance, Domestic Brands Adapt to Local Policies |
| access control | ★★★★★ be in favor ofRBAC/MFA, OutSystemsintegrated (as in integrated circuit)LDAP, Azure AD | ★★★★☆ light cavalry/Data-level permissions supported by Devon, Integrated HuaweiIAMand other indigenous systems | ★★★☆☆ Support for Role Permission Assignment, Abacus Cloud can integrate with Enterprise WeChat, Weak fine-tuned controls | Fine-grained control of low-code permissions, 0Code meets basic needs |
| Data Security Protection | ★★★★☆ Supported Transmission/Storage encryption, MendixProvide field-level encryption | ★★★★★ light cavalry/Netflix supports desensitization, dynamic watermark, Devon has a leak warning. | ★★★☆☆ Supports basic encryption, The MiCount Cloud leaves a trail of operations, No desensitization | Low-code protection tools are more comprehensive, 0Code focuses on basic security |
From visualization capabilities, Code Extensibility, The three dimensions of the landing cycle are compared
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| visualization capability | ★★★★★ Mendix/OutSystemsdrag-and-drop modeling, Real-time preview, Mature process orchestration | ★★★★☆ NetEase/The movable type hasAIassisted modeling, Light Cavalry adapts local business templates | ★★★★★ MiCount Cloud/MingDaoYun/Partner Cloud Template Enrichment(vetting, form etc.), Pure drag and drop operation | 0Easier code manipulation, Low code adaptation for complex modeling |
| Code Extensibility | ★★★★★ OutSystemsbe in favor ofJava/.NETembedding, MendixCustomizable plug-ins | ★★★★☆ light cavalry/Taffan support.Javaextensions, Kingdee/NetEase offers openAPI | ★★☆☆☆ No code scalability, Only in-template configuration adjustments are supported | Low-code customizable, 0Code has no room for expansion |
| Landing cycle | ★★★★★ Shortening of standardized scenarios40%-60%cyclicality, Rich component library | ★★★★☆ AIAuxiliary development shortening30%-50%cyclicality, Local templates speed up | ★★★★★ simple application1-3lit. the sky falls on the ground, Abacus Cloud Prefabricated Industry Templates | 0Fastest code landing, Low code combines speed and customization |
From third-party systems integration, Database Adaptation, Hardware device integration in three dimensions for Compare
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party systems integration | ★★★★★ adapterSAP, Oracle, Office 365International systems such as | ★★★★☆ going as fast as possible/Light Cavalry IntegrationSAP, Kingdee Linkage itselfERP, Adaptive pinning/Enterprise WeChat | ★★★☆☆ MiCount Cloud/Minto Cloud can be integrated with Enterprise WeChat/staple, Complexity is not supportedERPintegrated (as in integrated circuit) | Better low-code integration capabilities, Foreign adaptation of international systems, Domestic adaptation of local ecology |
| Database Adaptation | ★★★★★ be in favor ofOracle, SQL Serverand other international mainstream databases | ★★★★★ Compatible with international databases+Damon (name)/NPC Golden Warehouse and other domestic warehouses | ★★★☆☆ be in favor ofMySQL, SQL Server, MiCount Cloud Adaptation Local Database Deployment | Low-code database compatibility, 0Code Focus Common Libraries |
| Hardware Integration | ★★★☆☆ Support for regular office hardware, Industrial equipment to be customized | ★★★★☆ light cavalry/Devon Integrated Industrial Sensors, PLC, adaptive manufacturing/Energy Scenarios | ★★☆☆☆ Support for office hardware integration only, Counting Cloud can be interfaced with simple code scanning devices | Low-code adaptation to industrial hardware, 0Code for office scenarios only |
From O&M Tools, Fault response, Version iterations and upgrades are compared in three dimensions
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Tools | ★★★★★ OutSystemsVisualization Operation and Maintenance Platform, Support for performance analysis, version management | ★★★★☆ light cavalry/Delphi Chinese Operations Console, integrated (as in integrated circuit)Zabbixand other indigenous tools | ★★★☆☆ MiCount Cloud/Partner Cloud Simple Ops Dashboard, Support for log viewing, Basic Alerts | Low-code O&M tools are more professional, 0Code Ops Lightweight |
| Fault response | ★★★☆☆ English Support, response time4-8hourly, Premium support is available for a fee | ★★★★★ 7×24Hourly Chinese support, light cavalry/Kingdee can come to your home, 1-2Hourly response | ★★★★☆ 7×24Hourly Online Support, Troubleshooting assistance from the local Abacus Cloud team, 2-4Hourly response | Domestic brands respond faster, Low-code support for door-to-door Services |
| Version iterations and upgrades | ★★★★★ regular update, OutSystemsSupport for gray scale upgrades, No business interruption | ★★★★☆ season (sports)/Semi-annual updates, light cavalry/Devon provides a smooth upgrade guide | ★★★☆☆ Automatic silent upgrade, Some scenes need to be restarted, No grayscale capability | Smoother upgrades with low foreign code, 0Easy but inflexible code upgrades |
From the fee model, Basic Authorization Quote, Annual maintenance fee, Expansion and additional costs are compared in four dimensions
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fee model | ★★★☆☆ 1. Mendix/OutSystems: By Server Node+Concurrent user charges, Support annual payment/3pay annually; 2. PowerApps: subscribe by user(Local deployment needs to be paired withAzuresuite, per-node charging); No perpetual license option | ★★★★☆ 1. light cavalry/going as fast as possible: per node/Project fee, Support annual payment, perpetual license; 2. Kingdee/NetEase: annual payment based, Negotiate perpetual authorization for large projects; 3. movable typeface: per user/Node dual mode optional Negotiate perpetual authorization for large projects; 3. movable typeface: per user/Node dual mode optional | ★★★★★ 1. MiCount Cloud/MingDaoYun: per user/annual fees, Support for Step Prices; 2. Partner Cloud: Yearly project package/per-user fee, Inclusive packages are available for small and micro enterprises; None of them have a perpetual license, Supports on-demand capacity expansion | Domestic brands have a more flexible model, 0Lowest code cost threshold |
| Basic Authorization Quote | ★★★★☆☆ 1. Mendix: 10nodal+50be complicated by, approximately annual payment80-120ten thousand dollars; 2. OutSystems: Co-allocated annualized payments of approximately100-150ten thousand dollars; 3. PowerApps: 5nodal+30be complicated by, approximately annual payments40-60ten thousand Dollars (including Azuresuite) | ★★★★☆ 1. light cavalry: 10nodal+50be complicated by, pay annually30-50ten thousand dollars, perpetual license120-180ten thousand dollars; 2. going as fast as possible: Annualized payments with the same configuration25-45ten thousand dollars, perpetual license100-160ten thousand dollars; 3. as fast as possible: annualized payments with the same configuration25-45ten thousand dollars, perpetual license100-160ten thousand dollars; 3. Kingdee/ NetEase: pay annually30-50ten thousand dollars, perpetual license100-160ten thousand dollars; 3. NetEase: payments annually35-55ten thousand dollars; 4. movable typeface: 50subscriber annual payment8-15ten thousand dollars | ★★★★★ 1. MiCount Cloud: 50subscriber annual payment1.5-3ten thousand dollars, 100subscriber annual payment2.5-5ten thousand dollars; 2. MingDaoYun: Annualized payments with the same configuration1.8-3.5ten thousand dollars; 3. Partner Cloud: Small and microenterprise packages(50user-internal)1-2ten thousand dollars | price gradient: Foreign low code＞Domestic low code＞0coding |
| Annual maintenance fee | ★★★☆☆ Based on the authorization fee of15%-20%receive, Mendix/OutSystemsMinimum annual maintenance fee of not less than15ten thousand dollars, PowerAppsbe contained withinAzurepackages | ★★★★☆ Based on the authorization fee of10%-15%receive, light cavalry/Devon Perpetual License Annual Maintenance Fee by Node(10nodal3-5ten thousand dollars/year), Minimum annual maintenance fee for movable type1ten thousand dollars Dollars/year), Minimum annual maintenance fee for movable type1ten thousand dollars | ★★★★★ Included in annual authorization fee, No additional maintenance fees; Selected platform value-added Services(Such as exclusive customer Services)postpaid(pay annually0.5-1ten thousand dollars) | 0No additional maintenance costs for the code, Domestic low code maintenance fees are more affordable |
| Expansion and Additional Costs | ★★★★☆☆ Concurrent user scaling increases with every10 people, Increase in annual payments8%-12%; Customized plug-in development single module approx.20- 50ten thousand dollars | ★★★★☆ Node expansion increases with every5 units, Increase in annual payments5%-8%; Customized development of single module approx.8-25ten thousand Customized development of single module approx.8-25ten thousand dollars, Lower costs for local teams | ★★★★★ Subscriber capacity expansion at stepped price increments(50Each additional person above10Increase in per annum payments3%-5%); No custom development rights, No additional costs | Domestic platforms are cheaper to expand, 0Code without customization costs |
From technical support, Training Services, Three dimensions of channel cooperation support for Compare
| Compare dimension | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Summary of core differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Support | ★★★☆☆ English Mail/telephone support, No local team in the country | ★★★★★ 7×24Hourly Chinese support, light cavalry/Jindie/Devon has a local team that comes to your home | ★★★★☆ 7×24Hourly Online Support, MiCount Cloud/Minto Cloud provides exclusive customer Services docking | Domestic brand support is more localized, Low code with in-home Services |
| Training Services | ★★★★☆ English Online Courses+accreditation, High cost of offline training | ★★★★★ Chinese online/offline training, light cavalry/Kingdee has a perfect certification system, Customizable in-house training | ★★★★☆ Free Online Tutorials, The MiCount Cloud provides 1-on-1 Operational training, No certification system. | Better low-code training system, 0Code Training Focus Hands-on |
| Channel cooperation support | ★★★☆☆ Strict policy, rebates5%-10%, Limited support resources | ★★★★☆ rebates10%-15%, Provision of marketing materials, technology-enabled, project collaboration | ★★★★☆ MiCount Cloud/MingDaoYun Rebate8%-12%, Provision of standardized promotional materials, Streamlining the collaboration process | More channel support for domestic brands, Higher rebate percentage for lower codes |
From the manufacturing industry, financial industry, Government sector, Energy industry, Five scenarios for MSMEs to compare
| Industry Scenarios | low code-foreign brands | low code-domestic brand | 0coding-domestic brand | Recommended Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| manufacturing industry | ★★★☆☆ Generic Scene Adaptation, Lack of indigenous hardware integration capabilities | ★★★★★ light cavalry/Devon Adaptive Industrial Controls, Kingdee Linkage Finance/supply chains | ★★★☆☆ MiCount Cloud/Partner Cloud Adaptation Workshop Forms, Inventory counting lightweight scenarios | low code: light cavalry/going as fast as possible; 0coding: MiCount Cloud |
| financial industry | ★★★★☆ International Safety Standards, Lack of local compliance adaptation | ★★★★★ NetEaseCodeWave/Living Grid Adaptive Risk Control, Reporting Scenarios | ★★☆☆☆ Adaptation of departmental cost statistics only, No compliance capacity | low code: NetEaseCodeWave/movable typeface |
| Government sector | ★★☆☆☆ No local compliance certification, poor fit | ★★★★★ light cavalry/going as fast as possible/Kingdee Adaptation Approval, Data Management Scenarios | ★★★☆☆ MingDaoYun/MiCount Cloud Adapts to Grassroots Government Forms, ledger management | low code: light cavalry/going as fast as possible; 0coding: MingDaoYun |
| Energy industry | ★★★☆☆ Generic Scene Adaptation, No classified capacity | ★★★★★ light cavalry/Defan Adaptive Power, rail, Support for classified requirements | ★★☆☆☆ Not suitable for industrial control and classified scenarios | low code: light cavalry/going as fast as possible |
| small, medium and microenterprise | ★★☆☆☆ high cost, Complex deployment, poor fit | ★★★★☆☆ Kingdee/Lightweight version of the movable type grid, Moderate cost | ★★★★★ MiCount Cloud/MingDaoYun/Partner Cloud, inexpensive, rapid deployment | 0coding: MiCount Cloud/MingDaoYun/Partner Cloud |
Certified Channel Partner, Save15%-55%, Cost-effective low-code platform solutions for organizations.
Provided by a specialized technical team7×24Hourly support, From needs analysis, Program design to project landing whole process Services.
Covering mainstream low-code platforms at home and abroad, Provide customized selection advice and implementation Services for enterprises of different sizes..
© 2015-2035 Shanghai Siyang Information Technology Co. All Rights Reserved | ICP No. 16007722-8 | Shanghai Public Security Bureau 31010002005085
